Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 19%).
- Barnsley held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 6Lead |
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 277 | Accurate passes | 463Lead |
| 368 | Total passes | 563Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |