AFC Wimbledon vs Burton Albion Match Statistics & xG

AFC Wimbledon vs Burton Albion Match Statistics & xG | Sportra

AFC Wimbledon vs Burton Albion match statistics

xG, possession, shots, and full match statistics for AFC Wimbledon vs Burton Albion in League One.

Match statistics snapshot

Home fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
Home held more of the ball (60% possession).

AFC WimbledonvsBurton Albion

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Home	Statistic	Away
	Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.
2	OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.	2
9Lead	Shots inside the box	8

6Lead	Shots off target	4
3Lead	Shots on target	2

4Lead	Shots outside the box	1
13Lead	Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.	9

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Home	Statistic	Away
60%Lead	Ball possession	40%
75%Lead	Pass accuracy	61%
320Lead	Accurate passes	181
428Lead	Total passes	297

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Home	Statistic	Away
9Lead	Corner kicks	2

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Home	Statistic	Away
4Lead	Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.	3
1	Goalkeeper saves	3Lead
	Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Home	Statistic	Away
10Lead	Fouls	13
	Red cards
2Lead	Yellow cards	3

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Away leads box penetration (+28% vs Home)

1
Shot accuracy
Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.
Home23%51% share
Away22%49% share
Home leads (23% vs 22%).
2
Inside box ratio
How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.
Home69%44% share
Away89%56% share
Away leads box penetration (+28% vs Home)

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

1
Passes per shot
Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.
Home3350% share
Away3350% share
Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads territorial pressure (+48% vs Away)

1
Attack pressure score
Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.
Home3460% share
Away2340% share
Home leads territorial pressure (+48% vs Away)

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

2Home

duels won

2Away

1
Aggression rating
Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.
Home14.042% share
Away19.058% share
Away leads (19.0 vs 14.0).
2
Control rating
Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.
Home45.065% share
Away24.435% share
Home leads (45.0 vs 24.4).
3
Siege pressure
Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.
Home18.064% share
Away10.036% share
Home leads (18.0 vs 10.0).
4
Chaos factor
Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.
Home16.046% share
Away19.054% share
Away leads (19.0 vs 16.0).

AFC WimbledonvsBurton Albion

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Home	Statistic	Away
	Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.
2	OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.	2
9Lead	Shots inside the box	8

6Lead	Shots off target	4
3Lead	Shots on target	2

4Lead	Shots outside the box	1
13Lead	Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.	9

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Home	Statistic	Away
60%Lead	Ball possession	40%
75%Lead	Pass accuracy	61%
320Lead	Accurate passes	181
428Lead	Total passes	297

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Home	Statistic	Away
9Lead	Corner kicks	2

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Home	Statistic	Away
4Lead	Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.	3
1	Goalkeeper saves	3Lead
	Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Home	Statistic	Away
10Lead	Fouls	13
	Red cards
2Lead	Yellow cards	3

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Away leads box penetration (+28% vs Home)

1
Shot accuracy
Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.
Home23%51% share
Away22%49% share
Home leads (23% vs 22%).
2
Inside box ratio
How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.
Home69%44% share
Away89%56% share
Away leads box penetration (+28% vs Home)

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

1
Passes per shot
Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.
Home3350% share
Away3350% share
Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads territorial pressure (+48% vs Away)

1
Attack pressure score
Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.
Home3460% share
Away2340% share
Home leads territorial pressure (+48% vs Away)

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

2Home

duels won

2Away

1
Aggression rating
Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.
Home14.042% share
Away19.058% share
Away leads (19.0 vs 14.0).
2
Control rating
Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.
Home45.065% share
Away24.435% share
Home leads (45.0 vs 24.4).
3
Siege pressure
Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.
Home18.064% share
Away10.036% share
Home leads (18.0 vs 10.0).
4
Chaos factor
Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.
Home16.046% share
Away19.054% share
Away leads (19.0 vs 16.0).

AFC Wimbledon vs Burton Albion Match Statistics & xG

AFC Wimbledon vs Burton Albion match statistics

Match statistics snapshot

AFC Wimbledon vs Burton Albion match statistics

Match statistics snapshot

Shot accuracy

Inside box ratio

Passes per shot

Attack pressure score

Aggression rating

Control rating

Siege pressure

Chaos factor

Shot accuracy

Inside box ratio

Passes per shot

Attack pressure score

Aggression rating

Control rating

Siege pressure

Chaos factor