Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (17 vs 8 shots).
- Cheltenham was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 12%).
- AFC Wimbledon held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 68%Lead | Pass accuracy | 46% |
| 250Lead | Accurate passes | 95 |
| 369Lead | Total passes | 207 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Cheltenham |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.