Match statistics snapshot
- Crawley Town fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 27%).
- Crawley Town held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 202 | Accurate passes | 329Lead |
| 288 | Total passes | 420Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.