Match statistics snapshot
- Gillingham fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 9Lead |
| 2 |
| 3Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 45% | Pass accuracy | 59%Lead |
| 120 | Accurate passes | 166Lead |
| 267 | Total passes | 279Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.