Match statistics snapshot
- Ipswich fired more attempts (20 vs 2 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 25%).
- Ipswich held more of the ball (79% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 21% | Ball possession | 79%Lead |
| 49% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 84 | Accurate passes | 574Lead |
| 170 | Total passes | 649Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |