Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon created the clearer chances on xG (1.74 vs 0.20, Δ 1.54).
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (16 vs 2 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (19% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 1.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.20 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 282Lead | Accurate passes | 198 |
| 375Lead | Total passes | 312 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.