Match statistics snapshot
- Luton created the clearer chances on xG (0.36 vs 2.79, Δ 2.43).
- Luton fired more attempts (23 vs 6 shots).
- Luton was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 0.36 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.79Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 19Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 223 | Accurate passes | 475Lead |
| 305 | Total passes | 550Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Luton |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.