Match statistics snapshot
- Peterborough fired more attempts (18 vs 8 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 11%).
- Peterborough held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target | 12Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 61% | Pass accuracy | 67%Lead |
| 209 | Accurate passes | 275Lead |
| 344 | Total passes | 408Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Peterborough |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |