Match statistics snapshot
- Port Vale fired more attempts (5 vs 4 shots).
- Port Vale was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
- AFC Wimbledon held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 1Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 5Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 304Lead | Accurate passes | 215 |
| 406Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.