Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (33 vs 6 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (52% on target vs 33%).
- AFC Wimbledon held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Ramsgate |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 20Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 17Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 33Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Ramsgate |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 351Lead | Accurate passes | 278 |
| 415Lead | Total passes | 369 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Ramsgate |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Ramsgate |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 12Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Ramsgate |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.