Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon created the clearer chances on xG (3.15 vs 1.49, Δ 1.66).
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 3.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 185 | Accurate passes | 331Lead |
| 298 | Total passes | 439Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |