Match statistics snapshot
- AFC Wimbledon fired more attempts (10 vs 2 shots).
- Shrewsbury was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
- Shrewsbury held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots off target | 0 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 57% | Pass accuracy | 68%Lead |
| 204 | Accurate passes | 347Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 511Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.