Match statistics snapshot
- Stevenage created the clearer chances on xG (0.21 vs 0.58, Δ 0.37).
- Stevenage fired more attempts (11 vs 5 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (20% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 0.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.58Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 274Lead | Accurate passes | 221 |
| 368Lead | Total passes | 317 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Stevenage |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.