Match statistics snapshot
- Walsall fired more attempts (17 vs 6 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (83% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target |
| 10Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 291Lead | Accurate passes | 269 |
| 397Lead | Total passes | 372 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Afc Wimbledon | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.