Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense fired more attempts (33 vs 2 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (48% on target vs 0%).
- Fluminense held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Águia De Marabá | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 28Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 16Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 33Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Águia De Marabá | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 301 | Accurate passes | 580Lead |
| 365 | Total passes | 630Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Águia De Marabá | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Águia De Marabá | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 10Lead |
| 8Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Águia De Marabá | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.