Match statistics snapshot
- AIK Stockholm created the clearer chances on xG (2.12 vs 1.24, Δ 0.88).
- Mjallby AIF fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- AIK Stockholm was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aik Stockholm | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 2.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.24 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aik Stockholm | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 229 | Accurate passes | 431Lead |
| 344 | Total passes | 532Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aik Stockholm | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aik Stockholm | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aik Stockholm | Statistic | Mjallby Aif |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |