Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 2.14, Δ 1.34).
- Hammarby fired more attempts (22 vs 8 shots).
- AIK was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aik | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.14Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aik | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 127 | Accurate passes | 609Lead |
| 213 | Total passes | 725Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aik | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 13Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aik | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aik | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |