Match statistics snapshot
- AIK created the clearer chances on xG (1.91 vs 0.20, Δ 1.71).
- AIK fired more attempts (18 vs 2 shots).
- KIF Örebro was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aik | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 1.91Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.20 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aik | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 398Lead | Accurate passes | 203 |
| 509Lead | Total passes | 298 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aik | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aik | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aik | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.