Match statistics snapshot
- Ajax Cape Town fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Royal AM was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 17%).
- Royal AM held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ajax Cape Town | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ajax Cape Town | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 239 | Accurate passes | 341Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 463Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ajax Cape Town | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ajax Cape Town | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ajax Cape Town | Statistic | Royal Am |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.