Match statistics snapshot
- Ajax created the clearer chances on xG (2.44 vs 0.75, Δ 1.69).
- Ajax fired more attempts (22 vs 9 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ajax | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 2.44Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.75 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ajax | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 536Lead | Accurate passes | 247 |
| 611Lead | Total passes | 330 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ajax | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ajax | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 1.33 | Goals prevented | 1.33 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ajax | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.