Match statistics snapshot
- Al Nasr fired more attempts (12 vs 4 shots).
- Al Nasr was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 25%).
- Al Nasr held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ajman | Statistic | Al Nasr |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 0 |
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ajman | Statistic | Al Nasr |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 227 | Accurate passes | 505Lead |
| 305 | Total passes | 575Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ajman | Statistic | Al Nasr |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ajman | Statistic | Al Nasr |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ajman | Statistic | Al Nasr |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.