Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Hilal Saudi FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 3.24, Δ 2.13).
- Al-Hazm fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Al-Hilal Saudi FC was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al-hilal Saudi Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.24Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al-hilal Saudi Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 341Lead | Accurate passes | 336 |
| 404Lead | Total passes | 403 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al-hilal Saudi Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al-hilal Saudi Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| 0.99 | Goals prevented | 0.99 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al-hilal Saudi Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |