Match statistics snapshot
- Al Shabab was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al Shabab |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots off target |
| 0 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al Shabab |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 362 | Accurate passes | 364Lead |
| 437 | Total passes | 445Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al Shabab |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al Shabab |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al Shabab |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.