Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Hazm created the clearer chances on xG (2.45 vs 0.88, Δ 1.57).
- Al-Hazm fired more attempts (20 vs 17 shots).
- Al-Hazm was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al Taawon |
|---|---|---|
| 2.45Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.88 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 17 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al Taawon |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 294 | Accurate passes | 434Lead |
| 355 | Total passes | 496Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al Taawon |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al Taawon |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| 0.39 | Goals prevented | 0.39 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al-hazm | Statistic | Al Taawon |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.