Match statistics snapshot
- Renaissance Berkane created the clearer chances on xG (0.45 vs 1.26, Δ 0.81).
- Al Hilal Omdurman fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Renaissance Berkane was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al Hilal Omdurman | Statistic | Renaissance Berkane |
|---|---|---|
| 0.45 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.26Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al Hilal Omdurman | Statistic | Renaissance Berkane |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 246Lead | Accurate passes | 203 |
| 317Lead | Total passes | 280 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al Hilal Omdurman | Statistic | Renaissance Berkane |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al Hilal Omdurman | Statistic | Renaissance Berkane |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.20 | Goals prevented | 0.20 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al Hilal Omdurman | Statistic | Renaissance Berkane |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.