Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Hilal Saudi FC created the clearer chances on xG (4.50 vs 1.82, Δ 2.68).
- Al-Hilal Saudi FC fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Al-Faisaly FC was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al-hilal Saudi Fc | Statistic | Al-faisaly Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4.50Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.82 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al-hilal Saudi Fc | Statistic | Al-faisaly Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 309 | Accurate passes | 318Lead |
| 374 | Total passes | 376Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al-hilal Saudi Fc | Statistic | Al-faisaly Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al-hilal Saudi Fc | Statistic | Al-faisaly Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.73 | Goals prevented | -0.73 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al-hilal Saudi Fc | Statistic | Al-faisaly Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |