Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Hilal Saudi FC fired more attempts (15 vs 13 shots).
- Al-Hilal Saudi FC was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al-hilal Saudi Fc | Statistic | Persepolis Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 5 |
| 7 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al-hilal Saudi Fc | Statistic | Persepolis Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 355 | Accurate passes | 366Lead |
| 429 | Total passes | 446Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al-hilal Saudi Fc | Statistic | Persepolis Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al-hilal Saudi Fc | Statistic | Persepolis Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al-hilal Saudi Fc | Statistic | Persepolis Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |