Match statistics snapshot
- USM Alger fired more attempts (22 vs 5 shots).
- Al Hilal was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 27%).
- USM Alger held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al Hilal | Statistic | Usm Alger |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 14Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al Hilal | Statistic | Usm Alger |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 179 | Accurate passes | 359Lead |
| 271 | Total passes | 460Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al Hilal | Statistic | Usm Alger |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al Hilal | Statistic | Usm Alger |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al Hilal | Statistic | Usm Alger |
|---|---|---|
| 19Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.