Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Ittihad FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.46 vs 0.91, Δ 0.55).
- Al-Hazm fired more attempts (19 vs 13 shots).
- Al-Ittihad FC was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 32%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al-ittihad Fc | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 1.46Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al-ittihad Fc | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 316Lead | Accurate passes | 272 |
| 380Lead | Total passes | 328 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al-ittihad Fc | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al-ittihad Fc | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| -0.51 | Goals prevented | -0.51 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al-ittihad Fc | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.