Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Ittihad FC created the clearer chances on xG (3.49 vs 0.83, Δ 2.66).
- Al-Ittihad FC fired more attempts (14 vs 8 shots).
- Al-Ittihad FC was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al-ittihad Fc | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 3.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.83 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al-ittihad Fc | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 386Lead | Accurate passes | 321 |
| 443Lead | Total passes | 389 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al-ittihad Fc | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al-ittihad Fc | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.35 | Goals prevented | -0.35 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al-ittihad Fc | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |