Match statistics snapshot
- Ceramica Cleopatra fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Al Ittihad was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
- Ceramica Cleopatra held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al Ittihad | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al Ittihad | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 190 | Accurate passes | 403Lead |
| 293 | Total passes | 517Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al Ittihad | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al Ittihad | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al Ittihad | Statistic | Ceramica Cleopatra |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |