Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Markhiya fired more attempts (17 vs 4 shots).
- UMM Salal was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 35%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al-markhiya | Statistic | Umm Salal |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 7Lead |
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al-markhiya | Statistic | Umm Salal |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 380 | Accurate passes | 381Lead |
| 444Lead | Total passes | 432 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al-markhiya | Statistic | Umm Salal |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al-markhiya | Statistic | Umm Salal |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al-markhiya | Statistic | Umm Salal |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.