Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Qadisiyah FC created the clearer chances on xG (2.15 vs 0.70, Δ 1.45).
- Al-Qadisiyah FC fired more attempts (17 vs 5 shots).
- Al-Qadisiyah FC was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al-qadisiyah Fc | Statistic | Al-faisaly Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.70 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al-qadisiyah Fc | Statistic | Al-faisaly Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 468Lead | Accurate passes | 323 |
| 519Lead | Total passes | 385 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al-qadisiyah Fc | Statistic | Al-faisaly Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al-qadisiyah Fc | Statistic | Al-faisaly Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| -0.94 | Goals prevented | -0.94 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al-qadisiyah Fc | Statistic | Al-faisaly Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |