Match statistics snapshot
- Al Shabab fired more attempts (16 vs 6 shots).
- Al Shabab was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 17%).
- Al Shabab held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al-raed | Statistic | Al Shabab |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al-raed | Statistic | Al Shabab |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 257 | Accurate passes | 430Lead |
| 337 | Total passes | 502Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al-raed | Statistic | Al Shabab |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al-raed | Statistic | Al Shabab |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al-raed | Statistic | Al Shabab |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.