Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Nassr fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
- Al Shabab was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 26%).
- Al-Nassr held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Al-nassr |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 11Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 7 |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Al-nassr |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 158 | Accurate passes | 384Lead |
| 230 | Total passes | 448Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Al-nassr |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Al-nassr |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Al-nassr |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.