Match statistics snapshot
- Al Shabab created the clearer chances on xG (2.69 vs 1.22, Δ 1.47).
- Al Shabab fired more attempts (19 vs 11 shots).
- Al Shabab was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Neom |
|---|---|---|
| 2.69Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.22 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Neom |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 299 | Accurate passes | 422Lead |
| 341 | Total passes | 471Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Neom |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Neom |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Neom |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.