Match statistics snapshot
- Zamalek SC fired more attempts (9 vs 2 shots).
- Al Shabab was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 9 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 0 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 338 | Accurate passes | 378Lead |
| 424 | Total passes | 448Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al Shabab | Statistic | Zamalek Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 17Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 7 | Yellow cards | 5Lead |