Match statistics snapshot
- Al Taawon fired more attempts (11 vs 3 shots).
- Al-Hazm was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 36%).
- Al Taawon held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 412Lead | Accurate passes | 156 |
| 500Lead | Total passes | 229 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 2Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.