Match statistics snapshot
- Al Taawon fired more attempts (22 vs 10 shots).
- Al-Hazm was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 36%).
- Al Taawon held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 18Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 459Lead | Accurate passes | 286 |
| 525Lead | Total passes | 362 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.