Match statistics snapshot
- Al Taawon created the clearer chances on xG (1.43 vs 1.29, Δ 0.14).
- Al-Hazm fired more attempts (11 vs 5 shots).
- Al Taawon was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 55%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 1.43Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.29 |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 416Lead | Accurate passes | 319 |
| 498Lead | Total passes | 402 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hazm |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.