Match statistics snapshot
- Al-Hilal Saudi FC created the clearer chances on xG (1.44 vs 1.99, Δ 0.55).
- Al-Hilal Saudi FC fired more attempts (20 vs 6 shots).
- Al Taawon was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hilal Saudi Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.44 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.99Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hilal Saudi Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 241 | Accurate passes | 472Lead |
| 315 | Total passes | 532Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hilal Saudi Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hilal Saudi Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.10 | Goals prevented | -0.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-hilal Saudi Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |