Match statistics snapshot
- Al Taawon created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 0.69, Δ 1.18).
- Al Taawon fired more attempts (19 vs 3 shots).
- Al-Ittihad FC was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-ittihad Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.69 |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-ittihad Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 469Lead | Accurate passes | 323 |
| 538Lead | Total passes | 385 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-ittihad Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-ittihad Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.78 | Goals prevented | 0.78 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al Taawon | Statistic | Al-ittihad Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.