Match statistics snapshot
- Sharjah FC fired more attempts (16 vs 1 shots).
- Sharjah FC was more accurate in front of goal (19% on target vs 0%).
- Sharjah FC held more of the ball (78% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Al Urooba | Statistic | Sharjah Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 0 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Al Urooba | Statistic | Sharjah Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 22% | Ball possession | 78%Lead |
| 56% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 112 | Accurate passes | 615Lead |
| 201 | Total passes | 698Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Al Urooba | Statistic | Sharjah Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Al Urooba | Statistic | Sharjah Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Al Urooba | Statistic | Sharjah Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |