Match statistics snapshot
- Albacete fired more attempts (18 vs 12 shots).
- Albacete held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Albacete |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
5 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 5 |
12Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
6 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
18Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 12 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Albacete |
|---|---|---|
64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
706Lead | Accurate passes | 322 |
782Lead | Total passes | 421 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Albacete |
|---|---|---|
8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Albacete |
|---|---|---|
7Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 1 |
3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Celta Vigo | Statistic | Albacete |
|---|---|---|
15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Albacete leads shot accuracy (+20% vs Celta Vigo)
Albacete leads shot accuracy (+20% vs Celta Vigo)
Celta Vigo leads box penetration (+33% vs Albacete)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Albacete leads this block
Celta Vigo — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Celta Vigo — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Celta Vigo leads this block
Celta Vigo leads territorial pressure (+100% vs Albacete)
Celta Vigo leads territorial pressure (+100% vs Albacete)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Celta Vigo leads this block
Celta Vigo had the edge in 4 of 4 signals in this block.
Celta Vigo leads (19.0 vs 17.0).
Celta Vigo leads (57.6 vs 27.4).
Celta Vigo leads (20.0 vs 11.0).
Celta Vigo leads (24.0 vs 16.0).