Match statistics snapshot
- Albirex Niigata created the clearer chances on xG (1.48 vs 0.85, Δ 0.63).
- Gamba Osaka was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Albirex Niigata | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 1.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.85 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Albirex Niigata | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 432 | Accurate passes | 434Lead |
| 500 | Total passes | 514Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Albirex Niigata | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Albirex Niigata | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Albirex Niigata | Statistic | Gamba Osaka |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.