Match statistics snapshot
- Kashima created the clearer chances on xG (0.37 vs 1.42, Δ 1.05).
- Kashima fired more attempts (11 vs 9 shots).
- Kashima was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Albirex Niigata | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 0.37 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Albirex Niigata | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 68%Lead | Ball possession | 32% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 632Lead | Accurate passes | 253 |
| 708Lead | Total passes | 333 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Albirex Niigata | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Albirex Niigata | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Albirex Niigata | Statistic | Kashima |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.