Match statistics snapshot
- Aldosivi created the clearer chances on xG (1.80 vs 0.82, Δ 0.98).
- Aldosivi was more accurate in front of goal (69% on target vs 31%).
- Huracan held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Aldosivi | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 1.80Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.82 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Aldosivi | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 49% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 94 | Accurate passes | 293Lead |
| 192 | Total passes | 387Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Aldosivi | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Aldosivi | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| 0.20 | Goals prevented | 0.20 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Aldosivi | Statistic | Huracan |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.