Match statistics snapshot
- Häcken W created the clearer chances on xG (0.32 vs 4.05, Δ 3.73).
- Häcken W fired more attempts (30 vs 5 shots).
- Alingsås W was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 37%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Alingsås W | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 0.32 | Expected goals (xG) | 4.05Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 14Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 14Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 30Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Alingsås W | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 245 | Accurate passes | 322Lead |
| 352 | Total passes | 430Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Alingsås W | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Alingsås W | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Alingsås W | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.