Match statistics snapshot
- Almere City FC created the clearer chances on xG (2.61 vs 2.17, Δ 0.44).
- Ajax fired more attempts (22 vs 13 shots).
- Ajax was more accurate in front of goal (59% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Ajax |
|---|---|---|
| 2.61Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.17 |
| 5 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 13Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Ajax |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 169 | Accurate passes | 413Lead |
| 281 | Total passes | 524Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Ajax |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Ajax |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 11Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Almere City Fc | Statistic | Ajax |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |